08:00 – 17:00 Registration of participants

ESIL Board meets ESIL Interest Group Conveners

All Interest Group conveners are invited to a breakfast meeting with members of the ESIL Board

Restaurant “Klīversala”

(Interpretation will be available into Latvian, English and French during the morning sessions)

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle) 

How International Law Works in Times of Crisis

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

11:00 – 11:30 Coffee break

11:00 – 11:30 Poster Session

Pauls Raudseps (Weekly "IR") discusses The Relevance of International Law in Crisis Situations with Latvian Minister of Foreign Affairs Edgars Rinkēvičs

(In the morning sessions, interpretation will be available into Latvian, and French – English)

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

13:00 – 14:30 Lunch

13:00 – 14:30 Meet the Jurist – ESIL Mentoring Event

Agora 1: New Forms of Warfare and Armed Conflict 

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

Chair: Claus Kress (University of Cologne) 

Since its inception, international humanitarian law has been a constantly evolving field of international law. It has frequently been normatively out of step with events that it ought to have regulated ex ante. This Agora will discuss whether the existing normative framework of the law of armed conflict provides sufficient solutions to contemporary challenges, in particular those posed by new forms of warfare. Possible topics for papers in this Agora include challenges posed by new types of actors and conflicts, the impact of new technologies (especially weapons technology), and how new forms of warfare affect the relationship between international humanitarian law and other branches of international law, such as human rights. 

Agora 2: European Human Rights Architecture: Progress and Setbacks

“Jurista Vārds” Hall

Chair: Judge Danutė Jočienė (Constitutional Court of Lithuania; Mykolas Romeris University)

While Europe is proud of its human rights protection mechanisms at national and European levels, especially with the European Court of Human Rights and the individual right of complaint to the Court, in recent years a number of fundamental issues have challenged the human rights architecture. Some States have posed difficult questions about the system and CJEU Opinion 2/13 prominently questioned the competences of and responsibilities for human rights protection in Europe. This Agora will discuss whether these developments are necessary element towards further progress or whether they are setbacks for the system. Possible topics for papers in this Agora include: the issue of overlaps and inefficiencies within the European architecture; whether too many mechanisms may lead to too little protection and progress; the problem of compliance and the issue of fragmentation of regimes in Europe; and, more generally, whether the European human rights architecture can address the challenges of globalization and the setbacks of nationalism, and what would then be the way forward.

Agora 3: Minority Rights: Human Rights and Security Considerations

“LETA” Hall

Chair: Gudmundur Alfredsson (University of Akureyri, Riga Graduate School of Law)

The protection of minority rights has always posed challenges for international law. For fear of alleged secessionist movements and for other reasons, States have been reluctant to grant far-reaching rights to national minorities. This is demonstrated by the lack of clarity in international standards on minority rights, the fact that even a commonly accepted definition of the term 'minority' in international law is still lacking, and the weak international monitoring system.  At the same time, national protection of minority rights is often perceived as being inconsistent and inadequate, and today the question of minorities is more pressing than ever. This Agora will discuss the limitations of the present international regime in the light of current threats to minorities. Possible topics include the use and limitations of human rights law for the protection of minorities, the interface between minority issues and security, which may undermine progress in development and application of international standards, and more generally how international law can contribute to improving this record.

Agora 4: Is Current International Law on State Immunity in Crisis?

“Diena” Hall    

Chair: Philippa Webb (Dickson Poon School of Law, Kings College London)

The international law on the jurisdictional immunities of foreign States, their organs and assets abroad remains highly controversial. The aim of this Agora is to discuss areas of uncertainty and controversy in the law of state immunity. One example is the question of whether fair trial rights must take priority over the protection of State sovereignty, especially in relation to grave violations of human rights committed by individual state organs. While a large scholarly movement claims and courts of some States have answered this question in the affirmative, other international and domestic judicial practice, along with the International Law Commission, appear more reluctant to accept such changes. Other questions are whether the old-fashioned distinction between acta iure imperii and acta jure gestionis is still workable or whether it should be updated, and whether the traditional distinction between immunity from jurisdiction and immunity from execution is still tenable. What ways forward can be identified that would better protect the human rights of individuals, the legitimate interests of foreign private entities, and the unimpeded exercise by States and their organs of their public functions abroad? To what extent are these developments linked to the ongoing discussion about the changing structures of statehood?

16:00 – 16:30 Coffee break (sponsored by the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law)

Address by Anne Peters (Director at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law)

Forum 1: Territorial Disputes in Europe: What Role for International Law in the 21st Century?

“Jurista Vārds” Hall

Chair:  Christian Tams (University of Glasgow)

It has been estimated that there are more than 150 territorial disputes in today’s world and some of the most worrisome lie in Europe. While territorial disputes continue to be a dominant feature of the interstate system, the legal framework for resolving such disputes is changing. We live in a world of increased transboundary movements of people, capital, goods, services, and information. Evidently territorial disputes and sovereignty claims today are taking place within a changing framework where territoriality has become less important. This forum will discuss whether the law relating to territorial disputes is suited for resolving modern controversies. Does international law offer any means to contain and resolve territorial disputes in their modern forms and how does it accommodate the increasing incidence of transboundary movements?   

Forum 2: Contemporary Economic and Financial Crises and the Limits of International Regulation

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

Chair: Margot E. Salomon (London School of Economics)

The 2008 financial crisis that hit Europe led to an ongoing adaptation of global roles and institutions. Eight years on, challenges are still manifold. Despite attempts at the international level by the G20, the International Monetary Fund and the Financial Stability Board to address financial and economic instability by providing more effective (financial) market regulation and fighting tax evasion and corruption, the need for greater coordination and collective action by governments and international financial institutions remains. Beggar-thy-neighbour policies, mercantilist thinking, disguised protectionism and new geopolitical developments continue to challenge effective global cooperation. In a world which to a large extent remains intergovernmental, the limits of international regulation depend on states’ financial capabilities and political will. This forum will explore contemporary economic and financial issues in the globalized economy and the extent to which current international regulatory mechanisms are able to address them.

18:00 – 19:00 Conversation with the ESIL Book Prize Winner

Ziedonis Hall

18:00 – 19:00 Parallel ESIL Interest Groups Business Meetings

IG on Migration and Asylum Law “Jurista Vārds” Hall
IG on the International Legal Theory and International Environmental Law “LETA” Hall
IG on the EU as a Global Actor “Diena” Hall

Reception hosted by H.E. President of the Republic of Latvia Mr Raimonds Vējonis 

Dress code is Dark Suit

ESIL Board meets new ESIL Members

Restaurant "Klīversala"

Forum 3: History in Dispute: The Relevance and Role of Judicial Authentication and Its Consequences  

“Jurista Vārds” Hall

Chair: Judge Egils Levits (European Court of Justice)

There are always different perspectives on historical events and many disputes remain over historical facts. As the number of international tribunals has increased and the scope of their jurisdiction has widened, such disputes are increasingly brought to the attention of international adjudicators. Their possible engagement ranges from the establishment of a historical record in international criminal adjudication or taking note of the relevant historical background in human rights cases to questions of delimitation and the settlement of boundary disputes by the International Court of Justice or arbitral tribunals. This forum will explore the involvement of international courts with history. How much of history should properly be left to adjudication by international courts and tribunals, and why? How have courts dealt with the challenges of history in dispute, and what are the consequences of such involvement?

Forum 4: The Refugee (Law) Crisis

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

Chair: Alice Edwards (University of Oxford)

In the last few years, Europe has seen the arrival of ever more people fleeing their homes, often arriving from other continents. This development poses major challenges for the immigration and asylum policies of European states and of the European Union and questions are being raised about their compliance with international refugee law and human rights law. This forum will explore contemporary issues pertaining to the position of Europe and European law in the light of the current refugee crisis. For example, is a common view on the refugee crisis possible in Europe? And can the crisis be addressed within the context of the existing international legal framework?

Agora 5: International Law and the Baltic States

“LETA” Hall

Debate supported by the Baltic Yearbook of International Law and Brill Publishers

Chair: Mārtiņš Paparinskis (University College London)

After a long period of Soviet occupation the Baltic States reclaimed their independence and joined the European Union and NATO. They have maintained their claims to State continuity and endorsed international human rights law. However, the episode of the occupation still gives rise to many questions that are of more than historical importance. This Agora will discuss how realism and a quest for justice have conflicted, both during the Soviet period and following the restoration of independence, and what solutions could be found. Examples of topics that could be discussed are the status of the right to truth as a human right, the effects and limits of the non-recognition obligation, the status and rights of Soviet time settlers, issues pertaining to the withdrawal of the Soviet armed forces, and the questions of borders. This panel also invites papers that address the question of what international responses and reactions concerning the Baltic dilemmas tell about the role of international law. Papers that place the various aspects of the Baltic case study in a broader context are encouraged.

Agora 6:  Are Cyber Security and Privacy Reconcilable?

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

Chair: Nicholas Tsagourias (University of Sheffield)

The growth of information and communication technologies has created significant challenges. One of them is the protection of human rights in cyberspace, including the right to privacy, coupled with legitimate concerns of the industry and governments about cyber security and misuse of the Internet. The more the Internet becomes central to our daily lives, the more acute these challenges become. On one side, a recent report noted that state efforts to address the security of information technologies must go hand in hand with respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. Similar sentiments were expressed by the UN General Assembly and the Human Rights Council in their resolutions on privacy in the digital age. On the other side, cybercrime, industrial and other espionage, the use of the Internet for propagating extremist ideologies and other forms of misuse of new technologies require growing (and costly) investment in cyber security. Users may even disengage if the perceived disadvantages of the use of Internet start outweighing the perceived advantages. This Agora will examine the lines drawn between security concerns and fundamental freedoms, who gets to make the relevant decisions and in what processes, and the role of international cooperation in this respect.

Agora 7: Implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: what role for international law?

“Jurista Vārds” Hall

Chair: Maria Varaki (Kadir Has University)

With the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the General Assembly has taken a major step toward addressing one of the most structural sets of crisis of our time: the continuing poverty, inequality and injustice across the world, as well as the crisis in environmental sustainability. While the 2030 Agenda contains few express references, international law provides a powerful subtext for this Agenda. On the one hand, to a large extent, the very problems that the Agenda seeks to address are caused by structural biases of international law. On the other hand, international law may provide important building blocks for effective action in relation to poverty, inequality and environmental sustainability, including financing and investment for development. This panel invites proposals for papers addressing the role of international law in contributing to the crisis, and/or in offering solutions to it. Papers that expressly engage with the contents of the Agenda, and place the role of international law in the wider political, social and/or economic context of the Agenda, are encouraged.

Agora 8: The Gendered Imaginaries of Crisis in International Law

“Diena” Hall
(Roundtable discussion convened by Feminism and International Law Interest Group)

Chair: Bérénice Schramm (SOAS, University of London)

Law, and international law in particular, is a powerful site for imaginaries, those enshrined  in the values protected by the norms and principles it is made of, overlapping with those  projected onto the subjects and objects of said norms/principles. Thinking about  international law, and acting within its ambit, mobilises, and therefore validates, certain  visual and rhetorical images of the world revolving around invisible yet forceful, historical  and political cognitive structures such as gender, as well as race and class. The use of  sanitized vocabulary or the focus on certain aspects of crises and not on others makes in turn  for a selectivity within international law itself. The international agenda is therefore  narrowed down in accordance, on the basis of what international lawyers consider their “heroic mission” to be, which is also seen in international law’s treatment of women, either a victim of conflict or a western hero. These stereotypes are inadequate to fully address the  systemic and complex positionalities women experience in conflict or post-conflict societies  as well as peacetime, nor the various and contradictory uses that are made of gender in  international law-making and operationalization. 

This roundtable (agora) seeks to convene various perspectives on the ways current  crisis-ridden international law, or utopian crisis-free international law, thrive on instrumental  gendered narratives, as well as how the contributions feminist approaches can offer enlarged critical engagement with the status quo of international law and its blind focus on crisis.

Restaurant “Klīversala”

Forum 5: Global Governance in a World of Multiple Tensions

“Jurista Vārds” Hall

Chair: Jan Wouters (University of Leuven)

70 years after its founding, the United Nations, together with other international organizations, has been instrumental in the development of a more legitimate international order. In addition, international organizations have come to regulate state behaviour in ways that were not originally foreseen. Many hope that through the principles of the UN, intergovernmental cooperation, and the peaceful settlement of disputes, problems faced by humankind such as armed conflicts, poverty, radicalization and many others, will be addressed. However, international organizations oftentimes do not live up to such hopes and expectations. This may give rise to pessimism, or even a sense of permanent crisis in global governance. This forum will explore whether, despite multiple tensions, the system of international organizations can effectively address global problems and contribute to the furtherance of the idea of global governance. What elements in these international mechanisms might undermine the idea of global governance? And are there sufficient elements of global governance in place to prevent forces and tendencies pulling nations back into a more disordered world?

Forum 6: The Enforcement of International Law in (a) Crisis

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

Chair: Therese O’Donnell (University of Strathclyde)

The enforcement of international has always been seen as a weakness of the international system. International law’s link to politics remains a constant.  The degree of enforcement of international law varies from high enforcement in areas of low politics to rather low enforcement in sensitive and crisis-prone areas. In times of high-stakes crises, international law is sometimes dismissed as irrelevant. A whole new set of challenges to traditional structures based on interstate relations results from the emergence of non-state actors, be they individuals or multinational companies. On the one hand, activities of non-state actors that undermine international law have prompted states to search for new forms of enforcement of international law that would effectively address these activities. Interstate sanctions affecting individuals (who are at the same time protected by, for example, human rights law and investment law) demonstrate that international law is in a transition phase where the place of non-state actors remains unclear. On the other hand, the involvement of private actors and markets in the enforcement of international law has become more prominent, sometimes radically changing pre-existing enforcement problems. Moreover, many links between states and non-state actors remain, posing questions about the addressees of the enforcement measures taken under international law. This forum will reflect on whether we need to conceptualize different approaches to enforcement in order to understand why, when and how international law is effectively enforced.

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

Forum 7: Challenges for European Governance

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

Chair: Armin von Bogdandy (Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, University of Frankfurt/Main)

The emergence of the humanitarian, security, financial, and other crises in recent years poses challenges to European governance. The governance architecture in Europe, as it has developed after WWII, with the overlapping roles of the EU, the Council of Europe, the OSCE, NATO and various other institutions, is increasingly coming under scrutiny by governments as well as the general public. This forum will explore whether this incrementally developed governance structure can provide solutions for Europe’s problems. Does the system allow for effective and speedy decision-making when needed? What is the role of national interests in this complex European governance system? Is it clear in whose name, and for whose benefit, the various institutions act?  Can the institutions, most notably the EU, provide the necessary leadership to enable the strengthening of the international law system?

Forum 8: Current Events: Current Challenges in Countering Terrorism - Preventive and Punitive Responses 

“Jurista Vārds” Hall

Chair: Jānis Kažociņš (National Security Adviser to the President of Latvia, Secretary to the National Security Council)

The panel will address preventive and punitive dimensions concerning incitement to terrorism, including through the Internet, and the legal and other dimensions of the foreign terrorist fighters phenomenon. Both topics will be discussed against the framework of international law and put into European context by providing assessments of the draft EU Directive on the countering of terrorism (aimed at replacing the 2002 Framework Decision) and reflections on recent terrorist attacks in Europe, including ISIS-inspired suicide terrorism.

Pre-dinner welcome drinks sponsored by Oxford University Press

Location: The Riga Latvian Society House Big Hall (Rīgas Latviešu biedrības nama Lielā zāle)
Address: Merķeļa iela 13, Rīga

Agora 9: International Response to Challenges of Climate Change: The Law of Politics and the Politics of Law

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

Chair: Sandrine Maljean-Dubois (Aix-Marseille University; CNRS)

The Riga conference will meet at a defining moment in international policy and law-making. As science indicates, time is running out. A new agreement (scheduled for adoption in December 2015) is a unique chance to put the world on a path to a climatically safe future. This Agora will discuss how international law has responded, and can respond, to increasingly alarming warnings from science on climate change, with a particular focus on the intersection between law and politics in this area. Questions to be discussed include: What are the roles of politics and law in relation to climate change and how do they intersect or deviate? What can we learn about the fairness and effectiveness of international legal responses in the context of problems involving collective action and strong political interests? Is there a limit to the ability of international law to deal with a problem of this complexity and with such a long-term horizon?  Are the processes of international law-making attuned to the sense of urgency conveyed by scientific reports? What are the advantages and promises – and the pitfalls and limitations – of multilateralism? Is UN-based multilateralism past its sell-by date? Are there any (acceptable) alternatives?

Agora 10: International Legal Advice and Decision Making in Times of Crisis (convened by the ESIL Interest Group on Peace and Security)

“LETA” Hall

Chair: Aristoteles Constantinides (University of Cyprus)

 The processes through which international law shapes decision making within Governments are rarely explored. In large part this perhaps reflects the fact that for the most part these processes are rarely public. Yet there are instances where these issues come to the fore and shine a line on how international law shapes decision making within Governments in times of crisis. This Agora explores this question of how international law shapes decision making within Governments in times of crisis through a number of such instances, including: the response of the European Union to the Paris Terrorist Attacks; the UK’s Chilcot inquiry into the decision to intervene in Iraq; and the U.S.-led coalition against ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq and Syria and parliamentary war powers.

Agora 11: Law of the Sea: As ever, between Selden and Grotius

“Diena” Hall

Chair: Nilufer Oral (Istanbul Bilgi University)

In recent years European seas have faced several challenges, such as a dispute over the Arctic continental shelf, attempts by Georgia and Ukraine to limit merchant shipping to and from occupied territories in the Black Sea and, more generally, increasing competition for scarce maritime resources, including fisheries, oil and gas resources, and deep seabed mining.  Moreover, activities such as human trafficking, migration and piracy all pose challenges to what appeared to be a stable body of law. While these particular challenges are new, they are also part of a long-standing tension between territoriality (as reflected in the work of Selden) and freedom of the seas (associated with Grotius). This Agora will discuss whether current developments pose structural challenges for the law of the sea or whether they can be accommodated within the dominant regime.  Is there a need for new solutions within or beyond the UN Law of the Sea Convention? What approaches should be taken to deal with new challenges in the law of the sea?

Agora 12: The Challenge of Illiberal Actors and Movements to the Liberal International Legal Order

“Jurista Vārds” Hall

Chair: Judge Iulia Motoc (European Court of Human Rights; University of Bucharest)

The international legal order is oftentimes characterised as a liberal one. The post-second world war international law promises autonomy, territorial integrity, the right to self-defence and the right to self-determination to States. In return it imposes duties on States to respect human rights internally.  The current realpolitik seems to be far removed from this. Authoritarianism and totalitarianism are on the rise.  Globally and at the local level, there has been a surge in violent movements such as ISIL/Da’esh in the Middle East, and Boko Haram in Nigeria and surrounding countries. Radicalization finds support in many parts of the world. Vulnerable groups, in particular women, are at the receiving end of illiberal actors and movements.  Has the consensus on the liberal international legal order come to an end? How does the liberal international legal order combat illiberal forces and actors? Does it succeed?

Moderator: Ineta Ziemele

Ziedonis Hall (Ziedoņa Zāle)

12:30 – 13:00 Closing Ceremony

André Nollkaemper, President of ESIL